case law for vcsst - An Overview
case law for vcsst - An Overview
Blog Article
However, the above observation is without prejudice on the legal rights of your parties, arising out of your over marriage from the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of legislation. Read more
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears as well as a new system is put in its place.
ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to your offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Since the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside of a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based about the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is website on the market in specific limited situations, it can be generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but did not encourage the department of his/her innocence.
Because of this, merely citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think of it as calling another person to inform them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-such neighborhood, without actually giving them an address. Driving throughout the community wanting to find their phone is probably going to be more frustrating than it’s worthy of.
In certain jurisdictions, case regulation is often applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by legislation." It is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to either party and the case shall be decided through the competent court of law if pending. Read more
The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision plus the statutes.[four]
eight. For that reasons stated above, this court finds the petition being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend within the comments, and their request is So acceded to. All pending applications, if any, will also be dismissed. Read more
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are established by executive businesses based on statutes.